IRB Advisor – October 1, 2004
October 1, 2004
View Issues
-
Full review vs. a primary reviewer system: IRBs discuss pros and cons
Whether an IRBs protocol volume is small, medium, or large, its not easy to decide whether to have the entire board read every page in a protocol submission or have a primary and/or secondary reviewer system in which point people take on the bulk of the work. -
IRB splits to improve quality and efficiency
The IRB at Oakwood Healthcare System in Dearborn, MI, reviews protocols for four hospitals, including protocols written by masters level, doctoral level, nursing students, and the 150-plus residents. -
Spotlight on Compliance
One of the challenges faced by clinicians and investigations in accumulating data that might be used for research, is to determine the rules that apply to ensure its availability if and when the research moves forward. -
Medical research lacks female participants
Patients who participate in clinical trials not only have access to newer, experimental treatments, they also have access to more routine medical checkups and state-of-the-art technologies. For people with serious illnesses, and those without access to routine medical care, participation can make a significant difference in their care. Yet for many women, participation in medical research studies is still not an option. -
Audio conference: Including children in clinical research
-
News Brief: Swedish team looks at human proteome
While the mapping of the human genome provided scientists with a blueprint for understanding disease, Swedish researchers are trying to take the knowledge one step further, with the human proteome.