Healthcare Risk Management – July 1, 2021
July 1, 2021
View Issues
-
‘COVID Glow’ May Bring Benefits in Malpractice Litigation
Hospitals and other healthcare organizations could benefit from a COVID-19 “glow” or “halo effect” in which medical malpractice juries look more favorably on defendants because of the public’s positive perception of healthcare workers. The portrayal of doctors and nurses as heroes might leave a lasting impression that affects how jurors perceive defense arguments. -
Risk Managers Stressed by COVID-19, Other Pressures
Burnout and severe stress brought on by the pandemic may affect risk managers and patient safety professionals more than commonly known. Most attention related to stress is focused on frontline clinicians, but the effect on risk managers appears to be substantial. -
Craft Social Media Policies to Protect Patients, Respect Employee Rights
Healthcare employees’ use of social media brings the risks of violating HIPAA, disseminating incorrect information, and damaging the reputation of the hospital or health system. However, social media is so pervasive in most people’s lives that it is difficult to ban its use outright, even during work hours. That means healthcare organizations must carefully create social media policies that acknowledge its use by employees but set limits on what can be posted. -
Although Alarm Fatigue Remains a Problem, Some Progress Is Happening
New research is shedding light on alarm fatigue and how to combat it. False alarms may be more problematic than the overall noise level in a unit. -
Costs of Nursing Professional Liability Claims on the Rise
The results of an analysis of closed nursing claims indicate costs have recently risen, and the increase is worse in some specialties. The average total incurred for each professional liability claim involving nurses has increased from similar analyses in 2011 and 2015. Costs increased to more than $210,000 per claim, a 4% increase since 2015. -
Malpractice Trial Verdict Upheld in Knee Surgery Case After Challenge to Jury Instructions
This case shows the importance of jury instructions in medical negligence cases and defines how a court properly places the issues before the jury after evidence has been presented. -
Expert Failed to Sufficiently Connect Increased Risk of Harm to Actual Causation of Harm
This case illustrates the standard of causation used in wrongful death and other actions alleging a patient’s injuries were caused by a doctor’s or hospital’s negligence. In this case, the expert essentially testified to several actions by the hospital and attending physician that increased the risk of injury to the patient, but did not specifically conclude any one or more of those allegedly negligent actions actually caused the patient’s death.