Following anti-vaccine statements made by Republican presidential candidates at a Sept. 16 debate, David W. Kimberlin, MD, co-director of pediatric infectious diseases at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, wrote an opinion piece that was published in a local newspaper and provided to HEH upon request. Editor of the American Academy of Pediatricians prestigious Red Book guide and a pediatrician at Alabama Children’s Hospital, Kimberlin strongly refuted any link between the MMR vaccine and autism and compared delaying vaccinations to driving around with your child not buckled in a safety seat. Here is an excerpt of his article:
“If you walked through the halls of Children’s of Alabama, or any similar pediatric hospital across the country, just 10 years ago, children with severe dehydration due to rotavirus would have stared at you through sunken eyes. Twenty or 30 years ago, you would have seen children struggling to breathe or on ventilators with the classic rash of measles or chickenpox as the telltale sign of what was causing their lungs to fail. Or you would have seen babies with their arms and legs jerking uncontrollably from the seizures in their brains due to meningitis caused by bacteria such as Haemophilus, pneumococcus, or meningococcus.
Thirty years before that, you would have seen children in iron lungs because polio had destroyed the nerve connections in their spines and they could no longer breathe on their own. The lucky ones survived only to go home in a wheelchair because their legs were paralyzed. If you had visited the nursery 40 years ago, you would have seen babies with cloudy eyes, tiny heads, distended bellies, and skin that looked like a blueberry muffin — all because their mothers contracted German measles, or rubella, during the pregnancy.
We don’t see these things anymore. Alabama’s children, like those from across the country, are protected from these ravages because of the safe and effective vaccines they receive during childhood. When our grandparents and great-grandparents were children, about one in five babies born died before 5 years of age, mostly from infectious diseases. The medical miracles that are vaccines protect our children from such horrific fates.
But there is one catch with all of this: For vaccines to work, they have to be used — and used by large enough numbers of parents to prevent the vaccine-preventable diseases from gaining a foothold in a community and starting an epidemic. The vast majority of parents understand this and trust their pediatrician when she recommends that all the childhood vaccines be given on time. But a small number of parents hesitate, leaving their own children at risk and putting other children in danger as well. These parents love their children; there is no doubt about that. But they get sidetracked by false claims that question the safety of vaccines… [or] the schedule by which vaccines are recommended for children.
Young children’s immune systems are designed to be able to handle not only the number of vaccines that we give early in life, but actually much more. For example, during the common cold, an infant is exposed to approximately 30,000 viral proteins, or antigens, over two to three days. Over the first 18 years of life, a total of approximately 150 vaccine antigens are given to fully protect against all vaccine-preventable diseases. Babies get colds all the time and never have any problems. Giving 150 antigens over 18 years is a breeze compared with what we humans can handle! When presidential candidates (or anyone else) suggest that vaccines should be given but just on a slower schedule, they only risk children coming down with a life-threatening illness during the window of time between when the vaccine should have been given and when it was given. It would be like leaving your home for a 10-mile drive and not buckling your child into the car seat, then pulling over 5 miles into the trip and doing so — all that has been accomplished is putting the child at risk of dying in a car accident for the first 5 miles.”
Following anti-vaccine statements made by Republican presidential candidates at a Sept. 16 debate, David W. Kimberlin, MD, wrote an opinion piece that was published in a local newspaper and provided to HEH upon request.
You have reached your article limit for the month. Subscribe now to access this article plus other member-only content.
- Award-winning Medical Content
- Latest Advances & Development in Medicine
- Unbiased Content