
Medical Ethics Advisor
View Issues
-
Growing Demand for Ethics Expertise to Evaluate AI Tools Before Use in Healthcare
Ethicists increasingly are needed to guide the responsible development and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Their expertise ensures fairness, privacy protection, bias reduction, and patient-centered care, bridging gaps often overlooked in technical and business evaluations.
-
New Ethics Training Approaches Better Prepare Medical Students for Reality
Medical schools are adopting innovative ethics training methods, such as resident-led case conferences and humanities-based end-of-life education. These programs connect ethical principles to real clinical practice, helping trainees handle complex issues such as futility, patient autonomy, and dying patients.
-
Some IRB Policies Unfairly Exclude People with Uncertain Decision-Making Capacity
Many IRB policies exclude individuals with impaired decision-making capacity, raising ethical and civil rights concerns. Researchers and ethicists advocate for inclusion, reassessment of capacity, and accommodations to ensure fair participation while balancing risk, consent, and autonomy.
-
Fraud Is Persistent, Pervasive Ethics Concern with Social Media Recruitment
Fraudulent participants increasingly compromise research recruitment via social media, threatening data integrity. Although verification methods can deter scams, they often create accessibility barriers, especially in disability research. Ethicists and institutional review boards must balance inclusivity with fraud prevention strategies.
-
Studies Reveal Financial Conflicts Often Are Undisclosed, Raising Ethical Concerns
Physicians frequently fail to disclose financial conflicts of interest, undermining trust and objectivity. Discrepancies in reporting highlight the need for standardized disclosure policies, ethicist guidance, and stronger interventions to mitigate industry influence on medicine.
-
Most Bioethicists View Social Justice as an Important Part of Ethics Role
Most bioethicists see social justice as central to their work. They address inequities by amplifying vulnerable patients’ voices, examining institutional policies, and advising leadership, ensuring healthcare decisions respect dignity, fairness, and broader social responsibilities.