Skip to main content

Women’s Health and Travel

September 1, 1999

Women’s Health and Travel

Reviewed by Michele Barry, MD

At the international society of travel medicine in Montreal, a workshop was held which included pertinent issues for women and travel. Some specific subjects discussed were issues of contraception and travel, pregnancy and travel, menstruation and travel, violence toward women and travel, post-exposure emergency contraception (morning-after) regimens and post-exposure HIV prophylaxis regimens for high risk sex or rape. Issues of violence and rape for single women travelers were highlighted, and participants from emergency overseas services described how, with increasing frequency, they were treating women who were the victims of violence during travel.

Table 1-Methods of Contraception, Failure Rates, Disadvantages, and Advantages
Method Failure Rate Disadvantages Advantages
Periodic abstinence 20%
Spermicide alone 6-21% • vaginal irritation • may protect against some STDs
• lack of availability • noneffective vs. HIV
• shelf life in tropical
• climate unknown
Cervical cap with spermicide 11.5-18% • cervical irritation • protection against some STDs
• pap smear abnormalities • noneffective vs. HIV
• same as above
Diaphragm with spermicide 6-18% • cervical irritation • protection against some STDs
• pap smear abnormalities • noneffective vs. HIV
• risk of UTI
• same as above
Condom 1-5-2% • poor acceptability • protection against some STDs
5-21% • allergic reactions
•? availability of good quality
IUD
progesterone T 1.5-2% •­ ectopic pregnancy • menstrual blood loss
0.6-0.8% • rare uterine perforation (progesterone)
•­ menstrual blood loss (copper) • Cu can be left in place 10 years
Medroxyprogesterone 0.3% • menstrual irregularities • effective for 3 months
acetate (Depo-Provera) • headache
• weight gain
• acne
Oral contraception 0.1% • rare thromboembolism and stroke • protection against ovarian cancer,
Combined • MI in older smokers PID, anemia, and dysmenorrhea
• nausea, headaches, depression
Progesterone 0.5% • irrregular, unpredictable bleeding • protection against PID, anemia,
and dysmenorrhea
Levonorgestrel 0.09% • menstrual irregularities • ease of use
Sub-dermal implant • headache, weight gain, • effective for 5 years
Norplant • acne, removal problems


Pros and cons of contraception and travel are summarized in Table 1. A provocation discussion ensued amongst participants advocating continuation of oral contraception pill (OCP) regimens without the seven-day break to prevent menses during difficult travel. Although at times break-through bleeding can occur with continuous OCP, the majority of women can avoid having a period during this time period. Alternative menstrual devices for travel to countries where tampons or sanitary napkins are unable to be obtained easily were discussed during the workshop (see Table 2).

Table 2-Alternative Menstrual Devices
Device Disadvantages
"The Keeper"
menstrual cap • leakage
• messy and sometimes
difficult to remove
• holds 1 ounce
• difficult to clean
in public facilities
Cotton flannel reusable
menstrual pads • uncomfortable and not
• Belted pads conducive to daily pace
of active women
• Velcro or snaps • leakage
• require heavy laundering


Methods of emergency contraception are described in Table 3 for women who have intercourse without protection during travel, and an algorithm for prevention of pregnancy is shown in Table 4 for the woman who misses a pill or two during travel (see page 37).

Table 3-Methods of Emergency Contraception
Regimen Time After Intercourse Status of Method Reported Efficacy Source of Data
Up to:
Estrogen and progestin 72 hr Licensed in some countries 75-80% of pregnancies Meta-analysis of 100 studies
(5 mg of ethinyl estradiol since early 1980 (e.g., United prevented involving > 5000 women
daily for 5 days) Kingdom, the Netherlands)
0.5 mg of levonorgestrel available unlicensed in
given twice, with 12 hr the appropriate combination
between doses of oral-contraceptive pills

Levonorgestrel (0.75 mg 48 hours (possibly Licensed in some countries in Equivalent to estrogen- One randomized trial
given twice, with 12 hr up to 72 hours) Eastern Europe and Asia progestin involving 350 women
between doses
High-dose estrogen (e.g., 72 hr Licensed in the Netherlands; Equivalent to estrogen- Randomized trial
5 mg of ethinyl estradiol little used elsewhere progestin involving 250 women;
daily for 5 days) suggested early trials
failure rates < 1%

Mifepristone (a single 72 hr Widely used in China in a 100% effective Two randomized trials
600-mg dose) RU486 variety of lower doses; not (ovulation and involving a total of
licensed anywhere else for implantation) 600 women
emergency contraception

Danazol (400-800 mg 72 hr Used only under research Reports vary from failure Two randomized trials,
given twice 12 hr apart conditions rates of < 1% to ineffective one involving > 1700
or 400 mg given 3 times women and failure rates
at intervals of 12 hr of about 1%, and the
other involving 193
women suggesting little
or no effect

Copper intrauterine Up to 5 days after the Available worldwide Failure rates < 1% Meta-analysis of 20
device earliest estimated day but not licensed for published studies
of ovulation emergency contraception involving > 8000 women


A great deal of discussion was generated about post-exposure HIV prophylaxis (PEP) after sexual encounters and a strong argument was made for PEP after high risk sexual encounters. Triple or double therapy was recommended for unprotected receptive vaginal exposure with a known HIV positive partner or unprotected receptive anal exposure with a partner of unknown HIV status. Risk for transmission in these settings can be comparable to a high-risk needle stick. (The telephone hotline for emergency contraception information is 1-800-584-9911.)

References

1. Lurie P, et al. Postexposure prophylaxis after nonoccupational HIV exposure: Clinical, ethical, and policy considerations. JAMA 1998;280(20):1769-1773.

2. Pinkerton SD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of post-exposure prophylaxis following sexual exposure to HIV. AIDS 1998;12(9):1067-1078.

3. Samuel B, Barry M. The pregnant traveler. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1998;12(2):325-353.

4. Glasier A. Emergency postcoital contraception. N Engl J Med 1997;337(15):1058-1064.

5. Glasier A. Emergency contraception in a travel context. J Travel Med 1999;6:1-2.

6. Alternative feminine hygiene. Ms. Magazine, March 1993.

Which of the following are disadvantages of the use of a diaphragm with spermicide?

a. Cervical irritation

b. Risk of UTI

c. Pap smear abnormalities

d. All of the above